How and why do we teach what we teach?
Well, this is a question that I can only answer on behalf of my own family, not any other homeschoolers. Keep in mind that what works for us doesn't necessarily work for everyone either.
There aren't many dull days around here, and I couldn't honestly schedule everything properly if I tried. At least 3 days out of 5 some thing comes up to push our day ahead or behind "schedule" or we have the opportunity to do something out of the ordinary... but that's okay. That's the privilege of educating children at home, we can definitely do adapt. I know that some would argue that a schedule must be kept, children need structure and routine. To a certain extent this is true. My kids like to have some routines. What's clear though, is that
relationships matter more than routine. If an occasion arises to do something nice for someone else, to learn outside of this little box we live in by serving others... well that's worth much more than anything scheduled next in a textbook. So we don't always stick to our routines, and the days when we break from them are often some of the best spent.
I will tell you that another pro of keeping our kids home versus sending them to public school is that we don't have to have "
school at home". I know that this is hard to wrap your brain around sometimes, particularly if you haven't ever witnessed it. I still on occasion flashback to my own days in classrooms and wonder at how different we do things here. You see some homeschooled families do run their homes like a school, using boxed curriculum that include all the subjects, one workbook and one textbook. All you have to do is sit down and read the lesson, do the corresponding workbook pages and then move on to the next subject, with a quiz thrown in here and there. This is one end of the homeschool "extreme" if you will.
An opposite end exists too, in what some refer to as
Radical Unschooling. It basically entails no formal planning of lessons or the like. When the children are young you just play as much as you can and try to work in bits of knowledge here and there. As they grow older you encourage them to find subjects that they want to learn about and then you help them find out more about them. The key here is that the student leads the initiative and hopefully being a better student because of their interest in the topics at hand. Many things are learned by the students and taught by the parents, but they are learned because the time, opportunity or interest organically arises rather than because a professional educator somewhere says "teach them global studies at 14", etc. An example would be if at age 12 a girl reads the Diary of Anne Frank and shows interest in WWII... her parent would then pursue WWII studies for her.
We are not Radical Unschoolers either, although I am not opposed to the idea that each child has different opportune times to learn things. We are somewhere in the middle of these extremes, in an area that I would term "Relaxed Homeschooling with a Charlotte Mason Method". I don't buy one brand curriculum and follow it straight through. I made some executive decisions at the beginning of this adventure (2010) and decided to mix up the timeline a bit with history, grammar and math.
I don't sit with a teacher's guide (*gasp*!!) and teach from it. If it's a subject I'm not familiar with then I will review it but honestly I'm better at speaking to the kids if I can look them in the eye and explain something to them rather than read it how the author of a book intended. Sometimes it requires me to whip out the dry-erase board and draw them some nice little doodles or math examples. Sometimes it requires a puppet show re-enacting an event. (much more effort on my part.) Other times it's just me, having a conversation with them while they eat their breakfast in the morning, asking Aidan "Hey, if you have 21 cheerios in your bowl, how many more would you need in order to have 29?" (Look! Subtraction via the reversed method!)
There are times, of course, when sitting with a workbook or worksheet happens. Aidan loves his phonics workbooks and the math worksheets are always a favorite. I also read aloud to them regularly and he reads aloud to me too. Arts and music are woven throughout everything we do. He starts sign language lessons this week.
Somewhere out there in the vast world of internet someone is saying "The education experts of experty and experto state that you should spend one week on this, and two days on that, and that children best learn from the xyz methods of teaching, so who are you to question these methods?"
I am Mom. They are my kids and I know how to teach them. I know what works. I speak their language. We have taught them everything from birth to school age and at the risk of sounding proud, they are well educated. There has been nothing that I have attempted to teach to Aidan that he hasn't grasped. (Well except to flush the darn toilet after himself but that's another story.)
I know that this is a tough idea to accept, to think that I would be arrogant enough to believe that I would be more "qualified" than a trained teacher at a school. But here's the shocker... wait for it....
I am not qualified to teach at a public school, nor do I claim to be. The people who are willing to commit so much of their energy to other people's kids are angels in my book. I may be fairly well educated and I have a thorough knowledge of the topics that I will teach at home but I would never claim to be qualified to sit in front of 24 kids in a classroom and claim that I could teach even half of them to an acceptable standard. Those teachers are well-trained to follow the methods with the highest success rates (meaning they will reach a majority of the class with that method) and then they have to reassess, review, etc. with the children who don't respond to those methods. It must be exhausting, even it if it is a worthwhile profession. I could.not.do.it. I am however, absolutely sure that I am qualified to teach these kids in my class.. and I am sure that I will reach 100% of my students with the method I use.
Why? Well because I don't have to follow one way. If a technique I'm using doesn't work I can switch, and switch again until I find what works best for Aidan. If I need to spend extra weeks on learning time and money I can. If he doesn't need as much time in reading then we can make that change as well.
If something comes up that neither one of us understands.. Heaven forbid he want to study quantum physics at 15 or something... guess what? I can find an online college course and hook him right up with lectures, online community, etc. If at 16 he thinks he wants to be a Veterinarian, I can help him find a Vet to shadow or intern with so that he can make an informed decision before college. There are so many ways and opportunities that I can encourage his education. He will not be pigeon-holed into taking what someone else considers a well-rounded course load. If he exhibits natural talent in a certain area then we shall pursue it. If he shows interest in a certain career choice then it will be encouraged. There may be times when math takes a back seat to art, or music is dropped out so that he can focus more on science.
I know that I've discussed our philosophy on education, and I know that there are still some reading this who will throw out ideas about how awfully unsocialized they will be, or how neglectful of us to take away all those potential extracurricular activities. I'm here to tell you that our children, in fact most homeschool children, are not unsocialized. They are not sheltered at home. Vivi is in dance class once a week. Aidan loves attending VBS programs, story hours at the local library and play dates with his friends. He's currently weighing the option of Karate. Will he be in a marching band? Probably not. Could he join a band of some sort? Certainly. Will he have friends? He already does, both homeschooled and public schooled. Will he know how to converse with others? Even though he tends to be a reserved personality he typically has no problem holding a conversation with a child or adult after an initial few minutes of shyness. He's not a party animal by nature and even putting him in public school couldn't change that.
I can tell you that there are things that he definitely will miss out on. The, ahem, learned vocabulary of the public school hallways. I can guarantee you that when Aidan hears foul language it is not as part of his school day. (and yes, he does and will hear foul language, I'm not attempting to say that he is in a bubble where profanity doesn't exist but I promise you that there is less of it.) He also is missing out on pressures from his peers to conform to what is new, in style or impressive to other young people. If he likes something, no matter what, he will be able to participate in it and nobody here will ever tell him that he's a geek for it. He will not be bullied in this class. Except maybe by his sister when she wants to steal what's left of his lunch. I'm only half kidding about that.
There are a few other perks also. I was able to teach Aidan about Christmas this year. Not just along with all the other holidays, but about Christ's birth. In covering Ancient Civilizations I was able to explain that some people believe that we came from monkeys but that the BIBLE says otherwise which is why we don't believe in Evolution. In a couple months we'll be able to cover Easter, and I'm not talking about a bunny. I know that it sounds awful assuming to make the statement "We can teach them whatever we want." because well, not only is it technically not fully accurate but it also has an air of immaturity. Essentially though, it's true that we can teach them
HOW we want, or better yet how he best responds, and we truly are given core subjects to cover but much of the material we are able to add to and have a choice about.
We, as parents, spend more time with our children than any outside influence.
If you're still reading this and you're not annoyed with how long it is then I beg you to pay attention to the fact that almost everything I've written here is about my kids and what homeschooling can offer them. This is not a petition against public school. Both my husband and myself survived public school with flying colors and we did learn. Nope. This post is about stewardship. Parents are entrusted with a blessing (a child) who they are stewards of until adulthood. It's our privilege to bless our children by educating them and preparing them to stand on their own. My husband and I made a prayerful, informed decision to educate our children at home because it was the best choice for them. The best choice for some may in fact be public school. I have friends whose children attend a private Catholic school in the next town over and they couldn't imagine it otherwise. The key is to make it an informed decision by considering your options. Don't just accept the "norm" because there might be other options available. Find the best one. The "norm" might be more normal.. but let's face it your kids aren't normal, they are the best.
I'm working on a few more posts, specifically one with a list of the "curriculum" resources that I've used thus far and another to show what an average day looks like around here. Oh! And I'm going to post some pictures of our Valentine's Day too, because let's face it we do this all out of love. Also, if anyone is wondering, I'm aware that experty and experto are not real words. ;-) If you have any questions or ideas to suggest then please feel free to comment.